DUCK
HUNTING SEASON 2005: Confessions of a Unrepentant Duck-Shooter
By Claudette Vaughan
The Abolitionist-Online speaks to Grahame
Eames, Field and Game Board Member of Australia and co-owner of the magazine Feather
and Fur.
Q.
Are you looking forward to the 2005 Ducking Hunting season?
A. Yeah. Very much so.
Q. Part of the community’s perception of duck
shooting is there aren’t that many ducks left now on the Wetlands. Has that
been your experience?
A. Well that’s not the communities’ perception.
Q. Really?
A. No.
Q. It’s certainly the way the media has portrayed it.
A. Only some members of the media have repeated those
accusations from animal welfare/rights groups, or the RSPCA, or Animal
Liberation. But the general public doesn’t perceive that at all. As a
matter of fact, in NSW and Western Australia, the permits that are issued for pest destruction on
ducks are phenomenally more than the number of ducks that were ever shot during
opening and closing season. So that’s just not true. There’s small sections
of the media misrepresenting the truth by just repeating the claims of the
anti-hunting lobby.
Q. Do you think recreational duck shooting has an
image crisis?
A. No. Overseas research has shown it doesn’t have
an image crisis. Again this is a tactic of anti-hunting groups to try and
create or promote an image crisis. The research we have done and certainly the
research done by organisations overseas doesn’t indicate that. E.g., the new
campaign on the mulesing of sheep. They continue to purport that that activity
and the activity of live sheep export has a bad image but the research by
farming organisations just don’t hold that up. It’s just a media tactic.
Q. How has gun control effected you the shooters and Feather
and Fur magazine over the years?
A. Not at all. The gun control that took place was
the abolition of two types of firearms and everyone just went out and brought
brand new up-to-date guns. The gun control that took place actually put
better and more modern firearms in the hands of hunters. They all got paid for
the guns that were taken off them and some of these guns were invented in 1908,
and they were able to get a cheque and replace them with brand new guns.
Q. So this was the government buy back after the Port Arthur issue?
A. Yeah. The chap down there went crazy with a
military rifle. In the legislation that went through Australia wide, and already existed in Victoria since 1986, they banned
military rifles. Bureaucrats being what they were, they left a couple of
words off and they ended up banning all self-loading firearms including
shotguns and 22’s. Now those sporting shot-guns that they got banned, they got
caught up in the attempt to ban military fire-arms Australia-wide, so
self-loading had to be handed in by the duck and rabbit hunters, they all got
paid for it, gratefully paid by the tax payers of Australia – and we were all
able to order brand spanking new shot-guns by the very same tax payers.
Q. What is the official perception of duck shooters
from Steve Bracks? Is he pro-duck shooting? How have you found handling the
political side of things?
A. Mr Bracks and his government and his spokesperson
has said they are not anti-hunting and they have no intention of banning duck-hunting.
It’s a legitimate activity participated in rural Victoria so the evidence is there. They have
declared a season this year, there was a season last year, but there wasn’t
one the year before and that’s because of the drought. Every year that the
Brack government has been in power, there has been a season, except that one
time I mentioned due to drought.
Q. Do you think Laurie Levy’s campaign against duck
shooters has been successful?
A. No because duck-hunting continues and Laurie Levy
is a real no-where man sitting in a no-where land. He’s yesterday’s story.
Just have to look past his press releases and even that the media that were
there at his Duck Opening Demonstration. If you look at their cars that are
there half of them are interstate number plates. They get a mini bus from South Australia, for crying out loud,
to boost their numbers. Mr Levy continues to say that the majority of the
people want this banned and that’s just a lie and he’s going to have hundreds
of demonstrators out there on the wetland. Just have a look. The man can’t
raise 40 people anymore.
Q. What about the shooters coming from afar for this
years Victorian duck season? Have they been turned off by anti-ducking
shooting campaigns? Are they heading to Tasmania instead?
A. No. Not in the least. As a matter of fact we’ve
got Tasmanians, Queenslanders and Western Australians coming to Victoria this year. The drought
has been a problem. You can’t go fishing if there is no water in the river and
we’ve had the situation where we have had the worse drought in history and
people have not been able to hunt on their favourite wetlands.
We’ll all be heading over to South Australia then back to Victoria for the beginning of the
season. The licence uptake this year is greater but also the new applicants
that have been doing their exams across the State is five–fold to what it was
last year. Duck shooting is a sport that’s actually increasing in numbers, not
diminishing.
Q. What is the appeal of duck-shooting. Is it being
at one with nature, or the camaraderie of being with like-minded people?
A. It’s all of those things. To answer that
question, you’d have to answer the question: What is the appeal of fishing?
It’s no different. It’s away from home. It’s in the out-doors. It’s not
staying in motels. It’s out camping under the gum trees and sitting around the
campfire talking with friends you haven’t seen for years. You know we all went
to school together 30 years ago and now we’re spread all over Australia. This brings us all back
together once a year. The average bag of ducks is very small.
Q. What’s the catch these days?
A. The limit this year is 5 throughout the season
plus an extra 5 wood duck on the first two days. So on the first 2 days you
can take 10.
Q. Are they being cleanly shot because there is that
perception from the public asking, Are they being cleanly shot?
A. They certainly are. As much as possible. If you
don’t try and cleanly shoot the bird, you’re not going to get the bird. The
ammo and the firearms of today makes the job a heck of a lot easier.
Q. I read a couple of years ago that more women are
attracted to hunt ducks than ever before. Is that true?
A. Without a doubt. I’ve done classes this year,
preparing people for their exams, and I’d say about 15% of them were women this
year. That’s up from what it was 10 years ago.
Q. So I believe you have had a ballistic expert out
there this year and his name is Tom Roster from America. What did he have to say?
A. Tom Roster conducts educational programs right
across the world.
Q. How does Australia compare to the other countries?
A. Well, he made the comment that the Australian
shooters were well above average compared to the rest of the world. That
caused us a bit of pride. We are above average shots and we can judge
distances and we certainly have a above average knowledge of shot-gun
ballistics and how to pick your types of ammunition and guns and type of ducks
that you’re hunting. So that was good.
Q. What about America? Are they looking at Australian
performances to set the standard?
A. The whole world, the hunters, farmers and fishing
as well, is extremely concerned about the animal rights movement in Australia. They are pouring tens
of millions of dollars into Australia, backing animal rights movements. That’s why we’ve seen
PETA move into Australia recently. That’s why you’ve seen the Humane Society move into Australia. These organisations
have big offices in Sydney and Brisbane. That’s why Greenpeace is putting
money behind it. Australia has become a very urbanised, pacifist, anti-rural community and the
animal rights movement has made huge inroads into Australia. Have a look at farming practices
that have had to be changed because of animal rights. Have a look at the
“Cities”conventions of overseas Australia is regarded as the laughing stock. I went to a seminar once
with Dr Grahame Webb, from Darwin. He’s the world’s expert on crocodiles. I remember him
making the statement that when the Australian representative at these
conventions and commissions gets up to speak everybody in the audience gets up
and leaves. We seem to be the only country in the world that sends
Afghan-clad, crew-cut women wearing a nose ring to talk about conservation in Australia. To reiterate, the
whole world is looking at Australia on animal rights issues. We really have become the leading
loony tunes of the world.
Q. Lastly, please give me some quotes about your
feelings on the Green Movement and Greenies in general.
A. I just regard them as dissatisfied, purple and
orange pumpkin seed and lentil eaters. They have no interest in life. If you
have a look at the boys they certainly have never played on the local school
football team. If you have a look at the girls, they certainly never won the
school beauty pageant. They find a togetherness when they are together. They
have found a Cause and these days, if you have a real good look at them – and
we take photos of them, they truly are the rent-a-crowd. The entire
Victorian situation now is based in Ballarat. We haven’t got any people in Melbourne anymore. Like I say,
have a look at how many people they have this year, they’ll be lucky if they
number 20 people.
Q. Well, I’ll take a good look then.
Is there anything else you’d like to add?
A. Well Mr Levy’s famous quote in 1985 was
“Duck-hunting had 2 years to go”. Well, here it is. 2005 and the rains are
starting to come. The one thing that needs to be pushed [in this interview]
is the amount of money that is generated by duck shooting. Duck-hunters are
tourists and spend money. In NSW they banned recreational duck hunting which
was only a 3 month season but you can hunt 12 months of the year for crocodile
protection now. What that meant was the public wetlands weren’t hunted on
anymore, it was done on private land these days. So you take a place like
west Wyong. It costs the town one and a half million dollars in the first
weekend in lost revenue. Now the DSE here in Victoria have done research on it, that duck
hunting generates 30 million into Victoria and quail hunting brings in 8 million.
Now half a dozen orange-haired loonies buying
their pumpkin seeds to eat on the side of the swamp, or while holding up a
placard demonstrating, are not the sort of people that rural communities want
to visit them. And particularly the Rural Chamber of Commerce in the Shires
better wake up very quickly and make a decision whether they wish to support
hunters or they wish to turn a blind eye and run the risk that these
metropolitan urban dwellers eventually get a rural activity banned that they
will lose from.
Q. The perception of duck shooters are that they are
testosterone, pumped up, macho men who can’t distinguish between triggering
their rifle and ejaculating.
A. That was said by Senator Norm
Sanders at the press conference at the Southern Cross in 1986. I was there
when Norm Sanders made the statement. It was printed in the Herald and
his exact words were: “When hunters fire a gun it’s like ejaculating into a
moving feminine form and that we should all have our licence money taken away
and we should all do compulsory marriage-guidance counseling”. And if we could
get our marriages fixed up, we wouldn’t have the need to go hunting any more.
I’m still hunting, happily married with two children. Norm Sanders is
divorced. Figure that out.
|